Average Joe Reviews... Mace T-II arm and leg armour

24 November 2008  |   |   4 Comments
For the harder core of us in the mountain biking world, soft pads just wont do and something with a plastic shell is a must and the proliferation of knee/shin and forearm/elbow pads has increased year on year. Mace T-II arm and leg armour Reviewed Not only are these items solely in the possession of DH and FR riders but can often be seen sported by trail riders and even those who ride XC. There is a growing distaste in the DH world of what they call 'XC mincers' who will ride trails such as Glentress kitted up with such protection and full face helments. While sweating on an XC course in such gear isn’t my bag, each to their own I guess. Out of the mesh bag, the armour looks well made and robust and certainly coverage of the key parts of the body is good. Generally both units look smart and pretty scuff resistant with the legs looking a bit wider than most models. If it’s the Stormtrooper in black look that you are looking for then you have found the right gear. Fitting the legs the first few times is a bit of a puzzle as the straps are detachable hooking into the hard shell at one end and sticking at the other end via Velcro. Admittedly (and for the first time ever) I had to reach for the instructions on a set of body armour to work it all out and was disappointed to find that they were not much use either. Once all hooked in and strapped up, the pads are really comfortable and work really well certainly on a par with their rivals. Falling off and hitting the dirt led to little movement of sliding which can be common with similar designs and no real problems were experienced. All in all a good set of pads but with a confusing fitting system which could be solved by permanent fitting of the ends of the straps, I may have missed something here but I cannot see why they need to be detachable in the first place. www.windwave.co.uk www.macegear.com

4 Comments

mega_waster said on: 2 December 2008 20:06

What's with this xc mincers business? I think there's a real risk of alienating a large portion of riders with that phrase. Are we dividing ourselves into the extreme and the... mundane? That would be sad. Clearly a full-face helmet is not required for most xc and trail riding but "mincing" out on the trail can lead to some nasty injuries especially for the less experienced who are far more likely to come off. You can get a lot of speed up on downhill stretches and at the end of the day we all need to be back at work on Monday morning with our skin still on our bones, and our bones still in the same amount of pieces they were in before we left on Friday. People wear armour to stay safe. It's just some choose to be over protected and some just choose the wrong tools for the job while others get it spot on. It would be good to see some armour which was more trail/xc orientated as I think there's a market for it. We're already seeing how popular the soft pads are because they make riding and pedalling less uncomfortable. Maybe there will be more to follow. Mincers? ...well I do declare!

jimbo22 replied on: 3 December 2008 13:44

I think Joe is saying that some people think that way, not that he thinks that way. Cool those jets mega_waster :-)

mega_waster replied on: 3 December 2008 17:15

hahaha! you think?!

mega_waster said on: 8 May 2010 13:19

Bought a set of these for 30 quid in the CRC sale. Seems loads of attention has been put into the ventilation on the inside of the armour and at a glance they look good quality but the designers have overlooked the amazingly flimsy pieces of hard shell the detatchable straps hook into. One of these managed to break in the van on the way to the trails. These look like they'd be good pads if in wasn't for this issue. I say steer well clear. Kit like this needs to be tough not flimsy. Sent mine back for a refund and got some raceface ones instead. Try harder Mace.

Comment on this article

Want to add your comments about this review? Login or Sign-up by clicking the button below..

Login/Sign Up